Dinamika fertilitas dan prevalensi kontrasepsi di Indonesia

Umi Listyaningsih, Sonyaruri Satiti

Abstract


The fertility dynamics are related to the direction of population policies and socio-economic conditions of the community. From the 1970s to 1990, Soeharto had succeeded in reducing fertility rates. Unfortunately, population control had weakened in 2000 when the government adopted regional autonomy. Consequently, population control was no longer a priority due to the merger of institutions with the full authority of population and family planning. In addition, improving the socio-economic conditions of society poses challenges to population control efforts. This paper aims to analyze fertility and contraceptive prevalence rate trend in Indonesia based on the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey data. The data were analyzed using inferential statistics. The results indicate socio-economic conditions affect people’s mindset in deciding the use of contraception and pregnancy. People are aware of birth control but tend not to use modern contraception and move to traditional contraception. The socio-economic improvement of women, which causes negative child value, is sufficiently a sufficient condition to maintain or reduce fertility. Other factors such as improvement of maternal education, maternal participation in work, and increased family welfare that is important to keep fertility at a low level.


Keywords


dynamics, fertility, contraceptive prevalence, Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adioetomo, S. M., Burhan, L., & Yunus, N. (2010). 100 tahun demografi Indonesia: Mengubah nasib menjadi harapan. BKKBN dan LD-FEUI.

Adlakha, A. (1997). International brief population trends in India. Department of Commerce, Economics & Statistics Administration.

Ananta, A., Lim, T., Molyneaux, J. W., & Kantner, A. (1992). Fertility determinants in Indonesia: A sequential analysis of the proximate determinants. Majalah Demografi Indonesia, 37, 1-26.

Arsyad, S. S., & Nurhayati, S. (2017). Determinan fertilitas di Indonesia. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v11i1.65

Ayad, M. & Rathavuth, H. (2009). Levels & trend of contraceptive prevalence and estimate of unmet need for family planning in Rwanda: Further analysis of the Rwanda Demographic & Health Surveys 2000-2007/8. https://dhsprogram.com/publica tions/publication-fa67-further-analysis.cfm

BPS, BKKBN, Kemenkes, and Macro International Inc. (1992). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 1991. Badan Pusat Statistik.

_______. (1995). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 1994. BPS & Macro Int.

_______. (1998). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 1997. BPS & Macro Int.

_______. (2003). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2002-2003. BPS & Macro Int.

_______. (2008). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2008. BPS & Macro Int.

_______. (2013). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2012. BPS & Macro Int.

_______. (2018). Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia 2017. BPS & Macro Int.

BPS. (2010). Penduduk Indonesia: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik.

_______. (2020). Penduduk Indonesia: Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bollen, K. A., Glanville, J. L., & Stecklov, G. (2001). Socioeconomic status and class in studies of fertility and health in developing countries. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.soc.27.1.153

Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972149

_______. (2005). Long-range trends in adult mortality: Models and projection methods. Demography, 42(1), 23–49. http://www. jstor.org/stable/1515175

Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/2807974

Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804

Canning, D. (2011). The causes and consequences of demographic transition. Population Studies, 65(3), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2011.611372

Dabroni. (1990). Beberapa alternatif cara pengendalian fertilitas. Forum Geografi, 6, 43-49. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index. php/fg/issue/viewFile/113/72

Davis, K., & Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4(3), 211–235. https://doi.org/10. 1086/449714

Freedman, R. (1961). The sociology of human fertility: A trend report and bibliography. Current Sociology, 10(2), 35–68. https:// doi.org/10.1177/001139216101000201

Galor, O. (2012). The demographic transition: Causes and consequences. Cliometrica, 6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11698-011-0062-7

Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T., & Jasilioniene, A. (2009). The end of “lowest-low” fertility? Population Development Review, 35(4), 663-699. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 25593682

Götmark, F., & Andersson, M. (2020). Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889 -020-8331-7

Hatcher, R. A., Rinehart, W., Blackburn, R., Geller, J. S., & Shelton, J. D. (‎1997)‎. The essentials of contraceptive technology. Population Information Program, Johns Hopkins University, School of Public Health. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/ 10665/42331

Hull, V. J. (1976). The positive relation between economic class and family size in Java: A case study of the intermediate variables determining fertility. Population Institute, Gadjah Mada University.

Jayaraman, A., Mishra, V., & Arnold, F. (2009). The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1363/ifpp.35. 029.09

Kim, J. (2010). Women’s education and fertility: An analysis of the relationship between education and birth spacing in Indonesia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(4), 739–774. https://doi.org/10.1086/649638

Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic transition theory. Population Studies, 50(3), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149536

Letamo, G., & Letamo, H. N. (2001). The role of proximate determinants in fertility transition: A comparative study of Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Southern African Journal of Demography, 8(1), 29-35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 20853254

Magadi, M. A., & Curtis, S. L. (2003). Trends and determinants of contraceptive method choice in Kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 34(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00149.x

Majumder, N., & Ram, F. (2015). Explaining the role of proximate determinants on fertility decline among poor and non-poor in Asian Countries. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0115441. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115441

Neels, K., Murphy, M., Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2017). Rising educational participation and the trend to later childbearing. Population and Development Review, 43(4), 667–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12112

Population Division UN DESA. (2019). World population prospects 2019: Highlights. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf

Singarimbun, M. (1987, 16 Februari-7 Maret). Hubungan Keluarga Berencana dan fertilitas [Makalah]. Lokakarya Pendidikan Kependudukan dan Lingkungan Hidup, Yogyakarta.

Thompson, W. S. (1929). Population. American Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/214874

Todaro, M. & Smith, S. C. (2009). Pembangunan ekonomi di negara ketiga (Edisi kedelapan). Erlangga.

Ulfa, M. (2017). Respon pasangan usia subur terhadap program Keluarga Berencana gratis di Kelurahan Delima Kecamatan Tampan. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 4(2), 1-11. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jki.v16i2.595

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research Center for Population, Indonesian Institute of Sciences

Widya Graha Building, 7th and 10th floors
Jl. Jenderal Gatot Subroto 10 Jakarta Selatan, Telp (021) 5221687
Website: http:/kependudukan.lipi.go.id;
E-Journal: http://ejurnal.kependudukan.lipi.go.id
Pustaka: http://pustaka.kependudukan.lipi.go.id
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------